The White House’s Illegal Piggy Bank

Comments Off

TARP: The OMB direc­tor is grilled over the mis­use of bank bailout funds for pur­poses other than intended by Con­gress. This tax­payer money wasn’t intended to be the administration’s per­pet­ual slush fund.

This is the law,” Gregg said, hold­ing up the TARP guide­lines he helped write in 2008. “Let me tell you what the law says. Let me read to you again, because you don’t appear to under­stand the law. The law is very clear. The monies recouped from TARP shall be paid into the gen­eral fund of the Trea­sury for the reduc­tion of the pub­lic debt.

Comments Off

Budget 2010

Comments Off

b

Comments Off

If you can find a better deal, take it!

Comments Off

In fact, that’s exactly what Chris­tian­ity does. It’s the best deal in the uni­verse. (I know it seems strange that a self-described athe­ist and “rad­i­cal sex advice colum­nist fag­got” like Sav­age would miss the cen­tral point of Chris­tian­ity, but there it is.)

God sent his only son to get the crap beaten out of him, die for our sins and rise from the dead. If you believe that, you’re in. Your sins are washed away from you — sins even worse than adul­tery! — because of the cross.

He can­celed the record of the charges against us and took it away by nail­ing it to the cross.” Colos­sians 2:14.

Surely you remem­ber the cross, lib­er­als — the sym­bol banned by ACLU law­suits from pub­lic prop­erty through­out the land?

Chris­tian­ity is simul­ta­ne­ously the eas­i­est reli­gion in the world and the hard­est reli­gion in the world. .……

Comments Off

Socialism

Comments Off

s

Comments Off

Man marries pillow

no comments

True love can take many forms. In this case, it has taken the form of a Korean man falling in love with, and even­tu­ally mar­ry­ing, a large pil­low with a pic­ture of a woman on it.

Obama using ‘bounty hunters’ to root out fraud

no comments

Keep­ing up the pres­sure in his final push to pass health care over­haul, Obama signed an exec­u­tive order Tues­day that encour­ages pri­vate audi­tors to search out improper Medicare and Med­ic­aid pay­ments, from billing errors to out­right thievery.

Socialism vs Capitalism

no comments

Senate Warns Staffers to Avoid Drudge Report

no comments

SENATE WARNS EMPLOYEES TO AVOID THE DRUDGE REPORT
Tue Mar 09 2010 08:53:37 ET

Just as the health­care drama in the capi­tol reaches a grand finale, con­gres­sional offi­cials are warn­ing employ­ees to avoid the DRUDGE REPORT!

The Senate’s Com­mit­tee on Envi­ron­ment and Pub­lic Works issued an urgent email late Mon­day claim­ing the DRUDGE REPORT is ‘respon­si­ble for the many viruses pop­ping up through­out the Senate.’

The com­mit­tee ordered hill staff: ‘Try to avoid’ the DRUDGE REPORT ‘for now’.

On Mon­day DRUDGE served over 29 mil­lion pages with NOT ONE email com­plaint received about ‘pop ups’, or the site serv­ing ‘viruses’.

The site was seen 149,967 times since March 1st from users at senate.gov and 244,347 times at house.gov. [10,825 vis­its from the White House, eop.gov]

The Sys­tems Admin­is­tra­tor may want to con­tinue tak­ing her antibi­otic until the pre­scrip­tion runs out.

Devel­op­ing…

ID Card for Workers Is at Center of Immigration Plan">ID Card for Workers Is at Center of Immigration Plan

no comments

Law­mak­ers work­ing to craft a new com­pre­hen­sive immi­gra­tion bill have set­tled on a way to pre­vent employ­ers from hir­ing ille­gal immi­grants: a national bio­met­ric iden­ti­fi­ca­tion card all Amer­i­can work­ers would even­tu­ally be required to obtain.

Under the poten­tially con­tro­ver­sial plan still tak­ing shape in the Sen­ate, all legal U.S. work­ers, includ­ing cit­i­zens and immi­grants, would be issued an ID card with embed­ded infor­ma­tion, such as fin­ger­prints, to tie the card to the worker.

Guns Are Pointed at the Constitution

no comments

By all indi­ca­tions, the Court will soon order Chicago to lift its hand­gun ban, but lawyers oppos­ing the ban are deeply divided about which part of the Four­teenth Amend­ment the Court should invoke. The Court’s choice about which clause of the Four­teenth Amend­ment to use is crit­i­cally impor­tant, because that choice will likely deter­mine the high court’s path for decades to come.